by Paul Chaplin
I entered a rehab clinic last week.
Then I left almost immediately, because I was looking for
the post office, which was next door. Naturally the
experience got me to thinking about stamps (briefly, because
I don't know a lot about them and I really don't care to
learn at this late date) which led inevitably to the hobbies
and fixations of my boyhood.
I was a callow youth. At least I assume
I was. I mean who wasn't in those days? And I did collect
stamps, briefly, but I couldn't avoid the sense of sadness
that pervades that endeavor.
Coin collecting, however,
there's a muscular undertaking. I did that for a couple
years, quitting finally when I acquired an 1857 "Flying
Eagle" penny. I figured, what more can I possibly
accomplish? And when you take into account that I also
successfully owned an 1891-O Liberty dime, well, you can
easily see that I was one heck of a coin collector.
What is it about stamps as opposed to
coins? The phrase "stamp collector" has become synonymous
with any number of undesirable typologies, like "lives with
mother" or "has a specific place for his egg cartons," yet
for some reason a man who collects coins is assumed to
possess a kind of mystery sensuality.
I've thought a lot about it,
and here's the deal: Who cares about stamps? They reek of
impermanence and loss, and besides they're a dime a dozen:
Governments print new stamps like McDonalds cranks out movie
tie-ins. Don't even bother me about stamps, is my
attitude.
There is no swaying me. I'd
have more respect for someone who collects old phone
cords.
[posted 12/98]
|